You are currently browsing the tag archive for the ‘Information Lifecyle Management’ tag.
July 19, 2012 in Curation, Information Lifecycle Management, Social Media | Tags: browsing, Content, Curation, Data Mining, Definition, Information Lifecyle Management, Marketing, Networking, Pinterest, poll, Sharing, Signal, Social media, Social Network, Streams, visit | 24 comments
In a very short time curation has evolved from a minor supporting role to a major or even leading role in Social Media engagement. It is no longer sufficient to just share items of interest, breaking news and opinion, not if you want to be regarded as authentic and taken seriously.
Curation has many definitions, including my own: “Curation is the acquisition, evaluation, augmentation, exhibition, disposition and maintenance of digital information, usually centered around a specific topic or theme”. The Digital Curation Center (DCC) in the United Kingdom puts it more succinctly
Digital curation, broadly interpreted, is about maintaining and adding value to a trusted body of digital information for current and future use. (DCC)
Both definitions infer an information lifecyle process, that manages the digital objects from creation to deletion. Both suggest that capturing and adding value, whether by commentary or related material, is vital to the end product which is knowledge or information that can be referenced now and in the future.
However the evolution of digital curation is experiencing some fragmentation. Not that this is bad, but it does suggest the differences should be understood as curation tools will differ in features and capabilities as each tries to satisfy its target customer base. So far I have identified 3 major distinctions in curation:
- Marketing Content: comes in several forms as marketeers move away from landing pages on Facebook and web sites, and seek to amplify brand presence through curated content.
- Information (or Knowledge Content): More focused on collecting and condensing information to support a topic or subject. Most commonly a reference site usually set up for either internal or external collaboration
- Personal Content – less dependent on content management features and capabilites: can either be used for amplification (self-branding) or condensing (information).
The question I would like to pose is who visits these curated sites and what are their preferences. The following poll offers choices in the style and content of curated sites. Please let me know which sites you prefer to access for either information or shareable content. I have made a further distinction for sites that are the result of either employee or community collaboration as they possibly differ from information sites in the degree of social participation (ie more social).
May 15, 2012 in Curation, Information Lifecycle Management | Tags: Attribution, Brian Solis, British Museum, collaboration, commentary, Content, Curation, Curator, Data Administration, disposition, evaluation, exhibition, Information Lifecyle Management, Management, Network Weaver, Openness, organization, Pinterest, scoop.it, Social media, Social Network, Transparency | 3 comments
A recent post by Brian Solis “The Curation Economy and the 3 C’s of Information Commerce” neatly deconstructed the information flow within the Social Network. The 3 C’s are creation, curation and consumption, and while consumption remains the largest activity he correctly identified curation as a vital part of the social information chain, as it is the intermediary and often principle connecting service between the authors and readers of content
There are many curation tools available (@williampearl Shirley Williams’ blog post references 40). Most serious Social Media participants use one or several of them to save interesting content discovered or referenced in their daily pursuit of engagement.
Though the name curation is applied to such tools as scoop.it list.ly Pinterest and others all too often these tools act as nothing more than scrapbooks, with photos and articles appended to pages because they caught our imagination, piqued our interest or satisfied our desire to be seen as a member of a community of interest.
It is true that many curating users perform a rudimentary evaluation to classify the curated content and to position it within a relevant category; an even smaller number provide some commentary on the content. But like a scrapbook these collections remain static with a last-in first-presented view of the collection that has been assembled. Content that was first collected generally remains buried under more recent entries, and interactive commentary is almost non existent. As a result the value of such collections is greatly diminished and the prime activity of social media curators appears to be browsing the curated pages of others in search of new content to display on their own.
This observation may be harsh, yet I believe that there are many curators who do far more than I have indicated here, however the current tools have limitations. Furthermore to raise curation to the level required to act as the intermediary between creation and consumption, as indicated by Brian Solis, we need to bring aspects of Information Lifecycle Management disciplines and processes to bear on the problem. In a previous post on the network weaver I had already identified curation as one of the 5 major components of the social networking architecture. It is notable that it takes up to 2 years for a post graduate to obtain an MFA in curatorial studies or a Curation Diploma from the British Museum. I have used the British Museum course curriculum as a basis for identifying the sub components of Social Media Information Curation.
- Attribution – The first step on receiving any new content it to examine its provenance, determining source and history (journey) to the curation site. Part of this is validation, in social media terms checking that is not spam or spoofing, and part of it is ensuring the links and references are still active and, if not, refreshing them or marking them inactive. Once validated it is important to attribute the content to the author (direct) or those who have shared the content (indirect). The reason for doing this extends beyond mere politeness as it promotes the contributors and increases their relevance as possible collaborators in this or any related collection.
- Evaluation – the analytical step in the process and one that should not be embarked upon lightly, as it takes a high level of expertise to properly evaluate content. It is not just determining classification and category, it involves going several layers deeper to ascertain the nature and value of the content. Is the content authoritative, supportive, contrary, derivative, anecdotal or coincidental for example and, as a lead in to the next step, what is the etiology of the content and how is it related to other content entities?
- Organization – as with any information repository the key to consistent value is the way the content is organized, and the flexibility of the structures that support it. The value of content is greatly increased if the relationships between entities can be indicated and that links are flexible enough to be easily orchestrated when new content or understanding modifies the relationship.
- Commentary – Curators are also creators of content, a slight divergence from the Solis model which limits the curation role to an intermediary who is not part of the digirati (his description of the authoring elite). Commentary is an essential part of curation as it explains and amplifies the content and the relationships of content in any collection. However in an open collaborative environment commentary is not limited to just the curator or curation team. It can and should be as interactive as comment sections on blogs or message boards, with the curator as the default moderator. This is the activity that augments the content and extends the knowledge and value of the information.
- Exhibition – First and foremost the purpose of curation is to care for and promote the collected content and bring it to the attention of the consuming public. This is more than just broadcast and communication it is preparing and mounting a rich and informative display of connected artifacts, which illustrate the themes, dimensions and complexities of the subject at hand. Successful exhibitions are compelling, relevant and often topical. They also do not last forever, but can be dismantled and recreated with fresh insight and perspective at a later date.
- Disposition – unlike transactional data that needs to be aged and archived, social data is more like the objects in a museum, they are never destroyed or deleted, and rarely put into forgotten repositories. They are stored and maintained as objects with variable value and possibly potential future reuse, they are out of immediate sight but always available for reference or inclusion in other contemporary collections.
As can be seen from the diagram the information lifecyle has no end. Disposed (ie stored) information still needs to be maintained and re-evaluated and this is the task I have described as Collaborative Husbandry or collective farming. This is equivalent to the constant reexamination of requirements in The Open Group Architecture Framework (TOGAF), as current and new information can change curated landscape very quickly, and skilled curators should be able to adjust the curated content to accommodate this. The more sophisticated and comprehensive the collection the more curating resources are needed to maintain the information quality, which leads me to believe that enterprises will seek and appoint skilled curators and possibly even a Chief Curation Officer as they become increasingly dependent on external information and resources.
I would be interested to hear of additional requirements for Social Media Curation, as I believe we are still in discovery mode on what is needed to better identify, collect, discuss and exhibit the knowledge that is cascading through the global Social Media.
- Are You A Content Curator? 5 Best Practices For Content Curation (mithuhassan.wordpress.com)
- PSU-Art Curator Job Description (pluginin.org)
- 8 Social Curation Tricks For Pinterest And Beyond | iMediaConnection (mithuhassan.wordpress.com)
- A Marketer’s Guide to Content Curation (hubspot.com)
- “New Exhibit! Native American Cultural Objects at the CHP «.” New Exhibit! Native American Cultural Objects at the CHP «. n.p., n.d. Web. 9 May 2012. http://centerhistorypsychology.wordpress.com/2012/04/27/new-exhibit-native-american-cultural-objects-at-the-chp/.